ARTICLES of The New Presence
Law should prioritize process and principle rather than politics and results. The judiciary should rule as narrowly as possible to resolve the actual case or controversy presented. Yet with Bush v. Gore, where the Court prevented Florida from deciding a state electoral and constitutional matter, Citizens United, where the Court vastly expanded the issue presented by the litigants, telling them to brief and argue issues never presented to the Court (thus violating the judicial principle that a court should only rule on the actual case or controversy presented by the litigants), and now on the healthcare case, where the Court has chosen to act on broad issues on a fast track, judicial overreach is apparent. The case and controversy constraint
Obsah pro předplatitele
Chcete-li číst dál, podpořte nás předplatným pouhých 85 Kč/mě anebo 799 Kč/rok.
Pomůžete nám připravovat další autorské texty a získáte přístup k celému článku i archivu Přítomnosti.
published: 14. 5. 2012
Datum publikace:
14. 5. 2012
Autor článku:
William A. Cohn